All about the KOR-US FTA

So one of my readers asked me what the KOR-US FTA was after I mentioned it in the last article about COSTCO and their delicious pizza.  I think this shows how long I’ve been in Korea, because I naturally assumed that everyone would know what the KOR-US FTA is, as it’s such a big deal in Korea.

I am smacked back to reality to realize that in the grand scheme of things, in other parts of the world, there isn’t quite any reason for anyone to care about it, as it either doesn’t affect them, or it affects them so little that they don’t really notice it.  In Korea, naturally it’s really important, and it’s also quite a politically charged topic.

What does KOR-US FTA stand for?

It means the Korea – United States Free Trade Agreement.  Ideally, under free trade agreements, all tariff and taxes on goods are lifted between participating countries.  Did you ever wonder why Japanese cars are expensive in the U.S. despite being relatively cheap in Japan?  It’s because of the import taxes.  The U.S. government basically is taking their cut of your auto purchase.

WHAT?  That’s not fair!

Well, there are actually two schools of thought here.

Some would say that the domestic industry needs to be protected against foreign competitors who have a superior product at a cheaper price.  They usually cite labor costs in the U.S. for the reason that the American product is so expensive.  If people can buy a Honda Accord for less than the price of a Ford Taurus, then nobody would buy a Taurus.  The Ford factory would lose massive amounts of business, and thousands of American workers would lose their jobs as a result.

Others would say, yes, that’s not fair and they would want the government to step out and let the market decide.  So then if we take our Honda Accord vs. Ford Taurus example, Accords would naturally sell better, but this would force Ford to change their company or product somehow in order to stay competitive.

Okay so what’s this got to do with Korea?

Well in the KOR-US FTA as I understand it, Korea will no longer have tariffs on American products.  The U.S. in return will no longer have tariffs on Korean products.  (There are certain technicalities and exemptions in all FTA’s, so my explanation is a bit simplified.)  This kind of thing would have been unheard of  in Korea’s developing stage (from 1950’s to 1980’s).  Developing countries need to protect their industries against foreign competition specifically because nobody would ever buy the domestic product otherwise.  Now that Korea is a modern robust economy, discussions about FTAs are happening.  Naturally there are pros and cons to the FTA, and there are political parties for the FTA, as well as those against it.

What are the Pros?

For Korea, Korean products like cars, TV’s, cell phones, electronics, and high tech equipment can become more competitive in the U.S. market.  Hyundai, for example, which is already known for being an inexpensive  choice for American car buyers could actually become less expensive.  I would assume that sales would skyrocket after such a development.

For the U.S., American agricultural products would become more competitive in Korea.  At the moment, there are taxes and tariffs set up specifically to protect Korean farmers.  U.S. food products in Korea are marked up considerably and I’ve “heard” there’s actually a thriving black market that gets these products from American army bases undisclosed sources.

Under the FTA, all these agricultural products would become cheaper.  Since we originally started talking about the FTA in relation to  COSTCO in Korea, with American agricultural products being cheaper, almost everything in COSTCO would become inexpensive because there would be no import tax.  I’d probably shop there all the time instead of once in a while.

In short, the pros are that it is better from the point of view of American and Korean consumers.

What are the cons?

Well, take the pros for America.  Those are the cons for Korea.  Take the pros for Korea.  Those are the cons for America.

Let me explain.

With really inexpensive and high quality Hyundai, Kia, Samsung, and LG products, fewer Americans would buy Ford, GM, or American electronics products.  (Wow, I can’t even think of ONE American electronics company off the top of my head.  That’s sad.)  Anyway, the residual effects of the cheaper Korean products would make it more difficult for those American companies to compete, forcing them to make changes, which could result in American workers for those companies losing their jobs.  The U.S. would take a huge hit in the auto and electronics industry.

In Korea’s case, dirt cheap American agricultural products, most importantly California rice, would flood the Korean market, thereby putting the nail in the coffin for the Korean agricultural sector.  There would be a huge decrease in demand for Korean rice, Korean beef, Korean soybeans, Korean vegetables and fruits and even Korean canned products.  Agriculture as a living would then be impossible in Korea.  Agricultural land in the countryside would become virtually worthless, and cities would have an influx of migrants from the countryside in search of work.

(Edit:I found out later that rice is not included in the FTA, thereby allowing some protection to Korean rice farmers.)

In both cases these cons can be seen as short term problems, as after one or two generations, fewer people will be tied up in those sectors, or the sectors themselves would have somehow improved to stay alive.  Some would argue that the pros are also short term, but in the long run, the consumer ultimately wins with an FTA.   (Unless, of course, he can’t afford to buy anything because there are no jobs available because of the FTA.)

In short, the cons are for the owners of companies in protected industries and their employees.

What is YOUR opinion of the FTA?

That’s a good question.  I can see both sides of the debate.  On the one hand, I think that a company shouldn’t be penalized just because they are foreign,  if they have a superior product that they can sell inexpensively.  On the other hand, dropping the FTA on Korean farmers and American auto workers would be disastrous to those people.

Regardless of how I feel about it, the more important thing is how the U.S. Congress feels about it, because once they pass the KOR-US FTA, it’s going to be put into effect.

For more information about the KOR-US FTA, please visit this U.S. government website or read the wikipedia article.


8 Responses to “All about the KOR-US FTA”

  1. Danielle A Says:

    Wow, thank you for that informative blog entry! I will admit, the idea that more of the countryside of Korea will be without farmers interested in working the land fills me with some sadness. Even though we didn’t go there often, the times we went to visit older relatives in the countryside who were still tending to the fields standout in my mind as vivid memories. However, fewer and fewer young people are interested in the hard work that farming requires, so even with protectionism, I could see farming dying out in a few more generations anyway. This is especially of interest to me because of movements like Slow Food International have started to gain a number of people’s interest, but not equally in all places.

    I am excited to learn that I might be able to afford a good Korean car in the future though!

  2. Joy Balthazor Says:

    FTA will ruin US cars industry we need to say no.

  3. Osvaldo Hislip Says:

    Food in Korea if it’s less expensive then good. But I don’t think Koreans will buy the American car, so what is in it for US auto industry?

  4. FTA is really a good topic to discuss about. I think the Korean media & farmers are over-reacting. I think they are too concerned about their own goods that they can’t see, through FTA, Korea would grow as a whole. I’m pretty sure that they know that lol because they used the mad cow disease as an excuse to stop the FTA. I’m pretty sure that even though they protested, a lot of Koreans eat US beef without knowing it lol

    The US will also benefit as they have tons of agricultural goods that US alone cannot consume. Moreover, since there is too much food, the agriculture goods prices falls a lot. So it definitely benefits the farmers.

    The auto industries wouldn’t fall as well. I think they would start producing more luxurious cars but in fewer quantities maybe. I mean Ford, GM all have pretty good brand names. People would still want them even if the price is a bit higher than the Korean cars.

    The only problem with the FTA is that it works in theory but hard to put it in practice

    • The Seoul Searcher Says:

      I think you overestimate Ford and GM’s brand name value in the U.S. Nobody wants those cars. That’s why the US government had to bail out the Auto industry.

  5. Unbelievable, that’s exactly what I was shooting for! You just saved me alot of searching around

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: